ABC Enemy Interview
Terrorist leader targets DiggersSally Neighbour November 13, 2007
THE founder of the Iraqi terrorist militia Ansar al-Islam has called on his followers to kill Australian troops and their civilian support staff in Iraq, and defended his group's murder of Australian cameraman Paul Moran, killed by a suicide bomber in northern Iraq in March 2003.
Najmaddin Faraj Ahmad, who is commonly known as Mullah Krekar, has told the ABC's Foreign Correspondent program: "It is allowed for me to kill Australian soldiers in Iraq. It is allowed for me in Islam to kill his translator, to kill the people which give him food and water, give him medicine. All of them is in the line of the war."
Krekar justifies the murder of freelancer Moran, who was killed along with five Kurdish soldiers in an ambush by an Ansar al-Islam suicide bomber in Iraq's northern Kurdish region in the opening days of the Iraq war, because Moran "was also with our enemy".
Asked if he has a message forMoran's widow and family, Krekar replies: "I say to all of the Western womens: don't send your sons to kill us."
In the interview, to be broadcast tonight, Krekar says suicide bombing is a legitimate tactic.
"There's no difference between suicide bombs and using Kalashnikov," he says.
"What's the difference when you send the fighters to death?"
Krekar is a former student of the renowned Islamist theologian and al-Qa'ida founder Abdullah Azzam.
His Ansar al-Islam group, now also known as Ansar al-Sunna, is listed by the US, Australia and the UN as a terrorist organisation affiliated with al-Qa'ida.
Krekar was granted political asylum in Norway in 1991 and continues to live openly in Oslo, where he was interviewed by the ABC's Mark Corcoran.
Krekar claims to have relinquished command of Ansar al-Islam in May 2002 because of the difficulties of commanding the group while commuting from Norway.
However, terrorism analyst Lydia Khalil, who served with the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, says Krekar is still controlling sniper teams involved in the insurgency.
Krekar was arrested and charged with terrorism offences in Norway in March 2003, but released a month later when it was found that crucial evidence against him had been extracted from a detainee who was being tortured, and was therefore inadmissible in a Norwegian court.
Krekar recently lost an appeal against deportation from Norway to his native Iraq, but appears unlikely to be deported because of the Norwegian Government's policy against repatriating detainees to countries where they might face the death penalty.
Krekar has also thumbed his nose at Australian authorities, who have never conducted an investigation into Moran's death.
"If there was something against me, (known by) Norwegian people or Australian people, John Howard can send some people or some papers, some letters, to court in Norway," Krekar says.
"But no one ask me about this, which mean that I have not any contact with this."
Ms Khalil said she believed Krekar's role in Moran's death should be investigated.
"If it is proven that he did have operational control of Ansar al-Islam at that time, then I think that his role in that attack should be taken a look at quite closely," she said.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22748783-31477,00.html
posted by 10 men at 3:07 PM
4 Comments:
This sounds like more wisdom from "the religion of peace." I think we should do everything in our power to assure that people like this do "meet their maker."
INVASION OF THE PSYCHOPATHIC MOBOTS
Why are Muslims so different, so arrogant, aggressive, predatory and downright dangerous? Why are their leaders so deceitful and creepy? And why can they never live in peace with the rest of us?
To understand what makes Muslims tick, you need to understand how utterly slavishly they imitate the founder of their death-cult, the charlatan and false prophet Mohammed.
Mohammed was a terrorist, murderer, sadist, rapist, pedophile, slaver, robber, extortionist, control-freak, liar and charlatan. Okay, so nobody's perfect. But that unfortunately is the problem. Muslims are brainwashed from infancy into believing that Mohammed was indeed the perfect man, 'al-insan al-kamil and uswa hasana' the model of behavior for all those wishing to be obedient to Allah.
So to be a good Muslim is to be a robotic clone of the original founder of the the cult, whom you must emulate in every way, and in the process destroy your own individuality, judgement and conscience. Muslims try to ape Mohammed's behavior down to the tiniest details. For example, one of the Four Imams, Abmad ibn Hanbal, was a great Traditionalist. It is stated that he would not eat water-melons because, although he knew that the 'Prophet' ate them, he could not learn whether the 'Prophet' ate them with or without the rind, or whether he broke, bit or cut them.
Islam is not about right and wrong thinking but correct behaviour. If one imitates the behaviours of Mohammed, then one is observant and submissive. Morality is not a part of Islam. If there is a more fundamental difference between Islam and all other creeds and religions I do not know of it. It is so alien that the reader will have to consider its implications for some time to grasp the full meaning of it.
Muslims often try to deceive Christians and Jews into believing that Islam, like Christianity and Judaism, is one of three closely related 'Abrahamic faiths'. But if we examine the ethical basis of Islam, and judge the tree by its fruits, we realise that Islam is totally alien. Judaism and Christianity have more in common with the unrelated Buddhism than they do with Islam.
For the devout Muslim there is no place for conscience, compassion or empathy, only mobotic behavior patterns programmed by a long-dead psychopath. There is no morality to be had in Islam. There is consequently no Golden Rule ('Do not do to another that which would be hurtful to you') or any other higher ethical principles. There is nothing apart from a huge number of prescribed regulations which must be obsessively and compulsively observed. Hence the lack of originality and creativity in the Muslim world. The Ummah has effectively only one brain for 1.2 billion people and that brain belongs to Mohammed.
The muslim has no need for a conscience, because Mohammed's example determines what is right or wrong. If he wants to rape a nine year old girl or slaughter a few hundred kuffar then he will not be bothered by a guilty conscience, because the 'perfect man' has set the precedents.
One of the principle characteristics of a psychopath is that he lacks any conscience . So does Islam actually attempt to turn its adherents into psychopaths? In current clinical use, psychopathy is most commonly diagnosed using the checklist devised by Emeritus Professor Robert Hare. He describes psychopaths as "intraspecies predators who use charm, manipulation, intimidation, and violence to control others and to satisfy their own selfish needs. Lacking in conscience and in feelings for others, they take what they want and do as they please, violating social norms and expectations without guilt or remorse". "What is missing, in other words, are the very qualities that allow a human being to live in social harmony.".
Islam produces swarms of mobotic clones programmed to emulate a seventh century psychopath. "It is so alien that the reader will have to consider its implications for some time to grasp the full meaning of it. "
Not my lovely diggers!
(We owe you guys big time and to hear this piece of 7th century crap talking about your troops and citizens like this really tees me off. thanks 10Men - linking you!)
Cheers - Dinah
Would be nice if our ASIO had like a black ops wing, take out these sacks of crap when foreign courts are impotent and useless.
Post a Comment
<< Home