Thursday, November 30, 2006
China Bought Bomber Secrets
By Bill GertzThe Washington Times
China obtained secret stealth technology used on B-2 bomber engines from a Hawaii-based spy ring in a compromise U.S. officials say will allow Beijing to copy or counter a key weapon in the Pentagon’s new strategy against China.
Details of the classified defense technology related to the B-2’s engine exhaust system and its ability to avoid detection by infrared sensors were sold to Chinese officials by former defense contractor Noshir S. Gowadia, an Indian-born citizen charged with spying in a federal indictment released by prosecutors in Hawaii.
Additionally, Mr. Gowadia provided extensive technical assistance to Chinese weapons designers in developing a cruise missile with an engine exhaust system that is hard to detect by radar, according to court papers made public recently.
He also helped the Chinese modify a cruise missile so that it can intercept U.S. air-to-air missiles, and helped Chinese weapons designers improve testing and measurement facilities, the court papers state.Most of the indictment, handed up Nov. 8, outlines how the engineer helped China develop a radar-evading stealth exhaust nozzle for a cruise missile engine. Read the rest of this post »
Monday, November 20, 2006
GOD BLESS THE WEST
By Professor Moshe Sharon
The war has started a long time ago between two civilizations - between the civilization based on the Bible and between the civilization based on the Koran. And this must be clear.
I believe that Western civilization should hold together and support each other. Whether this will happen or not, I don't know. Israel finds itself on the front lines of this war. It needs the help of its sister civilization. It needs the help of America and Europe. It needs the help of the Christian world. One thing I am sure about, this help can be given by individual Christians who see this as the road to salvation.
U.S. in a Fog Over Muslims
Here is an excellent story by columnist Barrett Kalellis in NewsMax, reflecting upon and giving a summary of my recent talk at the Heritage Foundation:
As an increasingly impatient American public and political class now grasp at anything that might facilitate the extrication of military forces from Iraq (and provide themselves with political cover), it becomes more and more apparent that the situation in Baghdad will go down in history as the U.S. equivalent of Dien Bien Phu — the turning point in a military effort where popular will was lost and the enemy won, if only because their opposition decided to flee the theater of battle.
The present sorry state of affairs was predicted as far back as two weeks after 9/11, by myself and some other pundits. Pointing to a woeful lack of intelligence in the Middle East, the vacillating uncertainty about the worthiness of the cause, the religious fervor of the jihadist fanatics, and the general lack of patience and endurance for the long haul by the American public, the war on terror (and in Iraq) seemed likely to fail.
"To prevail in any war," I wrote in December 2003, "you first must know your enemy. Americans must understand that the worldwide network of terrorists is not going away until we stamp it out."
In the current conflict, knowing your enemy means having a thorough understanding of Islam, a subject that, to their detriment, most Americans know nothing about.
There is probably no one in America today that works harder than Robert Spencer, a scholar and writer about Islamic beliefs and traditions, whose mission is to make Americans aware of the true nature of radical Islam, and how this knowledge is indispensable for understanding and combating Islamic global jihad.
Spencer is a director of Jihad Watch, an organization that hosts two Web sites (jihadwatch.org and dhimmiwatch.org) that track radical Islamic news and events, and he has written six books and hundreds of articles on Islam and jihadi terrorism, including the recent best-sellers "The Truth About Muhammad," and "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)."
Spencer gives numerous speeches, participates in academic symposia, and is a frequent guest on radio and TV and in documentaries to raise consciousness about Islamic teachings and to combat widespread lies and distortions made by apologists for radical Islam.
In a powerful presentation to the Heritage Foundation last week in Washington, D.C., Spencer outlined the critical issues the West must be made aware of to face the threat that Islamic jihad poses.
"You can't fix what you won't admit is broken," Spencer said, "and you cannot reform what you say does not need reforming."
Peaceful Muslims have to confront and reform the elements of Islamic teachings and traditions that advocate violence, he noted, if there is to be an end to radicals using these to justify violence.
Spencer detailed several of the most egregious tenets of Islam that need reform, if there is to be any coexistence with the West, with the most fundamental being tolerance of non-Muslims.
The Quran teaches that only Islam is the true religion, and unbelievers have three options: 1) convert to Islam; 2) remain an infidel, and submit to humiliating subordinate status under Islamic law, including paying a hefty poll tax; or 3) wage war with, or be killed by, Muslims.
The rapid spread of Islam throughout formerly Christian lands beginning in the seventh century testifies to the zeal, deception, and savagery that Muslims have demonstrated to achieve their Quran-inspired goal of waging war against non-Muslims and imposing Islamic law first on Muslim states, then on non-Muslim countries.
Spencer pointed out that today, young jihadists are recruited wholesale around the world — even in the U.S. — based on these texts, with the promise to return to Allah's law.
Western analysts and policy-makers who are not aware or who choose to ignore these fundamental motivating principles when dealing with Muslim states, Spencer warns, do so at their peril.
This is especially true when negotiating with Muslim countries that profess to be our allies, yet continue to fund mosques and madrassas that preach hatred of the West, particularly against Jews and Americans, and are not being called to task.
He has harsh words for the fog of multicultural political correctness in which America is mired —
a cloud of self-righteous self-deception that blindly believes the feel-good falsehood that Islam is a "peaceful" religion "hijacked" by a few extremists.
This has dangerously strangled serious discussion of the issues that need to be addressed, Spencer claims, if the West is going to be able to deal with the jihadi threat.
Through his yeoman efforts, Spencer's message is beginning to gain some traction in popular opinion, along with that of fellow advocates like Nonie Darwish, Walid Shoebat, Brigitte Gabriel, Bat Ye'or, Andrew Bostom, Steve Emerson, Serge Trifkovic, Daniel Pipes, and others who are speaking out.
For their pains, many have received opprobrium from Muslims that are jihad sympathizers, including death threats. I salute their candor and their courage. In hindsight, if Americans had heard and understood their ideas a few short years ago, we might have made a different and more effective intervention into the intractable Middle East situation.
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
A victory for islam?
Ellison Supporters Chant "Allahu Akbar" at Acceptance Speech
A web comment below
1. In Conclusion
Make no mistake about it; Islam is well on the road to becoming a major spiritual/political influence in the New World.
It is imperative that we don’t lose sight of the fact that their ultimate goal is to rule the world.
It is patient enough, and sufficiently financed, to accomplish its goal, one country at a time. Muslim advocates are working fervently to convert America to Islam.
Their dream may not be practical, but they are gaining ground every day. There is a thought that often wakes me at night: The Muslims were able to conquer most of the known world in the 7th century with their limited and primitive means. What will happen to the world,
if America becomes a Muslim country, and its might, wealth, technology, and resources fall into the hands of the Muslims?
If this occurs, the New World will look like the old world. Time will lapse, and revert back to the 7th century, and the New World’s civilization will be reduced to a big, barren Sahara desert.
Sunday, November 12, 2006
Saturday, November 04, 2006
Cowboys and Islam
Attacking the Christian religion now only paves the way for Islam.
Backing a bigot
November 03, 2006 12:00am
ANDREW Bolt writes: It's the code of the tribe: the worst of us is better than the best of you. We have urgent work to do if we want to save ourselves.
Excuses over. The disgraced mufti of Australia set Muslims a test last month and they failed.
That test couldn't have been easier: make Sheik Taj el-Din al-Hilaly pay for preaching that unveiled women invited rape.
Prove that Muslims can't be led by a man who says raped women must be "jailed for life". Prove we have nothing to fear from your faith.
Simple? Yet yesterday 34 Muslim groups signed a petition backing this bigot, while others plan a big rally for Sydney tomorrow, denouncing not Hilaly but the non-Muslims who criticise him.
The results are in: Islam here -- as represented by many of its leaders -- is now a threat.
What's more: our culture of self-hate makes us too weak to properly resist.
I know saying such things is hard on the many moderate Muslims I keep insisting are out there. I am sorry for that, but where in God's name are those people? How much longer must we wait for them to speak?
For more than 20 years they said nothing as their most prominent imam, in their biggest mosque, damned Jews as perverts, called suicide bombers heroes, praised terror groups, vilified non-Muslims and hailed the September 11 terror attacks on the United States as "God's work against oppressors".
They said nothing as he gave the run of his mosque to a pro-bin Laden youth group and hired one of its translators as his spokesman.
For years they let this man, their mufti, represent Islam in this country, whose language he never really bothered to learn in nearly 30 years of living here.
But I never lost hope, and so for a few days last week thought . . . at last!
At last we heard Hilaly being damned by Muslims, too -- by women's groups, a Melbourne University academic and even the Islamic Council of Victoria, which had foolishly helped to make this Egyptian the mufti so no government would dare deport him. At last Muslims were disowning this man. He was disinvited from a Brisbane festival. There was talk of stripping him of his title.
The Lebanese Muslim Association, which runs the Lakemba mosque, even debated sacking him as imam, before banning him from preaching for three months.
No, this wasn't much, but many in the media grabbed it hungrily. We badly want to find Muslims who'll renounce the values of the hate-preachers, to show that it's not us against Islam.
Mind you, we shouldn't have had to be so pathetically grateful. What sane person could want a woman jailed for being raped?
But we should have known already this was a bigger problem than just Hilaly.
Last year Lebanese Sheik Faiz Mohammed also gave a speech in Sydney, which said raped women had themselves to blame.
And which of the 500 men who heard Hilaly say the same at his sermon complained? Only when it was reported in the English-speaking press did some concede Hilaly had gone too far.
Yet even then supporters sent him vanloads of flowers, and when he returned to his mosque last Friday he was greeted "like a rock star", said one paper, by an adoring crowd of 5000.
And that criticism of him? It faded away. Now the Lebanese Muslim Association isn't so ashamed of him, after all: "We did accept his apology and we want to move on."
The Muslim Women's Association, which first admitted to being "shocked" by Hilaly's sermon, now said he was "very good to all Muslim women". Said founding president Aziz El Saddik: "Those who say bad things about him, they have very bad manners." His sermon on rape was for Muslims only. Not our business.
But we can't afford to believe that any more. They weren't Muslim women, after all, who were raped by a Lebanese gang in Sydney, which called them "sluts" and "Aussie pigs".
It wasn't a Muslim teenager who was pack-raped in Sydney by Pakistani brothers, whose father told the court: "What do (the victims) expect to happen to them? Girls from Pakistan don't go out at night."
When Hilaly preaches excuses for such rapes, that concerns us all. Very much.
But it is true that not all those defending Hilaly like what he said. The people behind tomorrow's rally say, rather, that our criticism of him has degenerated into just Muslim-bashing.
Yesterday's statement by 34 Muslim groups -- most representing Islamic colleges and students, or the Muslims of tomorrow -- says the same, even as it confirms something far more scary.
"We believe that the public scrutiny of this matter should have ended with the sheik's apology," it says.
"We believe that the Muslim community should be allowed to deal with the ramifications of the incident without interference from people who only wish to promote hostility and incite hatred towards our community. Finally, we consider this matter to be closed."
Closed? In fact, Hilaly has not retracted a word of what he said. If this matter is "closed" then he has won.
But what is most frightening is not that he's won, but how. Both this statement and the rally show he's won because even educated Muslims, born right here, think it's better to defend a Muslim bigot than to have him criticised by infidels.
It's the code of the tribe: the worst of us is better than the best of you. It's a closed community speaking -- a paranoid one that sees itself at war even with people whose only worry is that their preacher excuses rapists.
And menace is in the air. What other congregation at prayer needs to be reminded -- as Hilaly reminded those at his mosque last week -- not to punch people on the way out? Which other rally for a religious leader needs to be warned -- as the NSW Police Minister warned this week -- that police would not tolerate any violence?
I'm not surprised one of Hilaly's former advisers, Jamal Rifi, warns that if he hangs on as Lakemba's imam he may trigger "racial tensions, much bigger than what we had over the Cronulla riots".
But what are we doing to help Muslims to break from him and leave this cultural ghetto, this encampment, before things get truly ugly?
Not enough. For a start, we make too many excuses for the Hilalys, as if they were mere children, or Australia the real villain.
Yesterday Suzanne Bassette, national secretary of the Australian Democrats, even said: "I'm willing to stand up with anybody else in this country who happens to agree with Sheik Hilaly's sentiments . . . Unfortunately, how a woman dresses does affect her level of likeliness to be chosen."
She said the "real lesson" from this fuss was this "latest opportunity to get angry". The problem wasn't the mufti who wants to jail raped women, but his critics.
Bassette wasn't alone. The Age ran a big cartoon likewise blaming sluttish white girls for putting themselves in danger, and federal Labor's Peter Garrett, the former singer, said Hilaly's comments were terrible, but "at the same time, the levels of violence against Australian women is something happening in the bars, in the clubs, in the bedrooms, in the boardrooms".
Again, we are the truly wicked. Leave Hilaly alone.
How can a culture so sick of itself resist the kind of challenge that Hilaly and his angry supporters represent? How can it inspire young Muslims to side not with him but with us?
I don't know, when we teach the young we are a country of child-stealing, land-raping, Muslim-murdering, Yank-licking, gas-belching vandals. Until that changes, expect the traffic to flow more into Hilaly's ghetto than out of it.
Just consider the radical mother of two of the Australian Muslims arrested in Yemen last week on terrorism charges, and accused of ties to al-Qaida -- a so-called former "hippy chick" from Mudgee, who found in Islam what she couldn't in the society that raised her.
As I said: Muslims have failed. But so have we all. We now have urgent work to do, if we want to save ourselves from far more strife than we dare yet imagine or say.
Join Andrew at blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt
===========an interesting tale below==============
Three strangers strike up a conversation in the airport passenger lounge in Calgary Alberta, while awaiting their respective flights.
One is a North American Indian passing through from Lame Deer.
Another is a Cowboy on his way to Lethbridge for a livestock show.
The third passenger is a fundamentalist Arab student, newly arrived at the University of Calgary from the Middle East.
Their discussion drifts to their diverse cultures.
Soon, the two Westerners learn that the Arab is a devout, radical Muslim and the conversation falls into an uneasy lull.
The cowboy leans back in his chair, crosses his boots on a magazine table and tips his big sweat-stained hat forward over his face.The wind outside is blowing tumbleweeds around, and the old windsock is flapping; but still no plane comes.
Finally, the American Indian clears his throat and softly he speaks, “At one time here, my people were many, but sadly, now we are few.”
The Muslim student raises an eyebrow and leans forward, “Once my people were few,” he sneers, “and now we are many. Why do you suppose that is?”
The Alberta cowboy shifts his toothpick to one side of his mouth and from the darkness beneath his Stetson says in a smooth drawl,
“That’s ’cause we ain’t played Cowboys and Muslims yet, but I do believe it’s a-comin’.”
Life & Death Situation
Civilization and its Enemies
Civilization and its Enemies, by Lee Harris. It is compulsory reading for anyone in the Alliance!
Since the very beginning Harris says
"Civilized people forget that in order to produce a civilization there must be what the German sociologist Norbert Elias has called "the civilizing process," and that this process, if it is to be successful, must begin virtually at our birth, and hence many long years before the child can have any say about the training he would have preferred. They forget that the civilizing process we undergo must duplicate that of our neighbors, if we are to understand each other in our day-to-day intercourse."
This points two things that, as Harris says, people easily forget when living in high civilization. Many people (especially intellectuals) nowadays seem to think that civilization is something that springs naturally and spontaneously without any human effort. The "All men are created equal and they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights" (paraphrased), requires that first there be a civilization in order for that to be true.
In the state of nature there is no such thing as human rights or any rights whatsoever. In the state of nature there is only force. Rights can only exist within a civilization that treats those rights as a given, and which is willing and capable of upholding those rights, by force when necessary.
This is something that so many people forget today.
"Civilized people forget how much work it is not to kill one's neighbors, simply because this work was all done by our ancestors so that it could be willed to us as an heirloom. They forget that in time of danger, in the face of the enemy, they must trust and confide in each other, or perish. They forget that to fight an enemy it is necessary to have a leader whom you trust, and how, at such times, this trust is a civic duty and not evidence of one's credulity. They forget, in short, that there has ever been a category of human experience called the enemy.
That, before 9/11, was what had happened to us. The very concept of the enemy had been banished from our moral and political vocabulary. An enemy was just a friend we hadn't done enough for yet. Or perhaps there had been a misunderstanding, or an oversight on our part - something that we could correct.
[...] The enemy is someone who is willing to die in order to kill you. And while it is true that the enemy always hates us for a reason, it is his reason and not ours. He does not hate us for our faults any more than for our virtues. He sees a different world from ours, and in the world he sees, we are his enemy.
That is why those who uphold the values of the Enlightenment so often refuse to recognize that those who are trying to kill them are their enemy. They hope that by pretending that the enemy is simply misguided, or misunderstood, or politically immature, he will cease to be an enemy. This is an illusion. To see the enemy as someone who is merely an awkward negotiator or sadly lacking in savoir faire and diplomatic aplomb is perverse. It shows contempt for the depth and sincerity of his convictions, a terrible mistake to make when you are dealing with someone who wants you dead.
We are the enemy of those who murdered us on 9/11. And if you are the enemy, then you have an enemy [....]
Once someone else sees you as the enemy, then you must yourself deal with this category of human experience, which is why societies that have enemies are radically different from societies that do not.
But societies with enemies must do all of these things. and do them very well, or else they perish.
The first duty of all civilization is to create pockets of peacebleness in which violence is not used as a means of obtaining one's objective; the second duty is to defend these pockets against those who try to disrupt their peace, either from within or from without. Yet the values that bring peace are the opposite values from those that promote military prowess, and this poses a riddle that very few societies have been able to solve and then only fitfully. If you have managed to create your own pocket of peace -and its inseparable companion, prosperity- how will you keep those who envy you your prosperity from destroying your peace?
There is only one way: you must fight back; if your enemy insists on a war to the finish, then you have no choice but to fight such a war. It is your enemy, and not you, who decides what is a matter of life and death."
This book is REALLY good.
Friday, November 03, 2006
3 more Games- Can't help myself
Surf for all you're worth. Pull off jumps & tricks.
|Play this free game now!!|
Can you be the savior and destroy the enemy fleet?
|Play this free game now!!|
Perform awesome stunts and race your motorcycle to victory.
|Play this free game now!!|
Game time from miniclip.com
War On Terrorism
Take a stand against terrorism and save the day.
|Play this free game now!!|
War on terror 2
War On Terrorism 2
An excellent sequel to the classic War on Terrorism game.
|Play this free game now!!|
The enemy is approaching and you are all that stands in the way.
|Play this free game now!!|
Muhammad Don't Surf
When I walk out of a sermon on a Sunday, I generally feel inspired to do good.
Thursday, November 02, 2006
The Rape of Europe:
Europe is in trouble...
Death Squads operate in Iraq seeking gays. It may happen here too.
It's OK to kill gays -- British imam
Sharia Alert from Britain, via GCN,
The leading imam in Manchester, confirms that he thinks the execution of sexually active gay men is justified, the rights group Outrage reported.
Arshad Misbahi of the Manchester Central Mosque confirmed his views in a conversation to John Casson, a local psychotherapist.
Casson said: "I asked him if the execution of gay Muslims in Iran and Iraq was an acceptable punishment in Sharia law, or the result of culture, not religion.
"He told me that in a true Islamic state, such punishments were part of Islam: If the person had had a trial, at which four witnesses testified that they had seen the actual homosexual acts."
"I asked him what would be the British Muslim view? He repeated that in an Islamic state these punishments were justified. They might result in the deaths of thousands but if this deterred millions from having sex, and spreading disease, then it was worthwhile to protect the wider community."
"I checked again that this was not a matter of tradition, culture or local prejudice. 'No,' he said, 'It is part of the central tenets of Islam: that sex outside marriage is forbidden; this is stated in the Koran and the prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) had stated that these punishments were due to such behaviours.'"
Cox & Forkum
The Best no BS cartoons in the West www.coxandforkum.com
Socialist France Today: some comments below from LGF.
I really don't understand why Frawnce doesn't just pay the damn jizya and get it over with. They have already surrendered and are already virtual dhimmis. Legal dhimmitude is the logical next step.
Memo to liberal nutballs:
Now's your chance to actually do something for the world. And I don't mean inventing a new scented candle. When the Muslims take over France they're going to destroy the artworks there just as fast as they blew up those Buddhas in Afghanistan. You'll note that the Mona Lisa is shamelessly uncovered. So start networking with the other artsy-fartsy guys in France, Holland, et al. to get a contingency plan in place to move the art to the USA.
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
Media sold out to Islam
Islam buys the media
Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, the President of OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) found a suitable way to counter the alleged anti-Islam campaign in the Western media. At a recent meeting of the OIC in Jeddah, in Saudi Arabia, he proposed: “
The Moslem investors should invest money in the big international media organizations, which often generate sizable profits, in order to be able to influence their policy through the boards of directors.”
At the time of globalization and freedom of capital movement, it is not difficult to invest in the media. The Arab capital, particularly of the Saudis, has for a long time been present in the West, and France is one of these countries, where the Gulf States invest readily. The network of the interests between the Moslem countries and France is very vast. It includes many fields of commerce and industry.
The question is thus: up to what point the Arab and Moslem investments in the media can influence and endanger the traditional French moderation, tolerance and the respect for the free expression of opinions? In Paris there are rumors circulating according to which 45 per cent of the shares of the biggest French news service, the AFP, could already be in the hands of Saudi investors.
In spite of its serious reputation, which AFP enjoys in the international media world, its information policy sometimes evokes suspicion . For example, until recently, AFP avoided calling terrorists…by their true name: “terrorists”, inventing such euphemisms as “combatants”, “partisans” or “resistance movement”. One journalists told us the following anecdote: Some time ago, on a display boards in the corridors of the Agency, appeared a note authorizing the use of the word “terrorist”. But for how long?
The press, particularly on the Left, shows much “comprehension” and sympathy toward the Islamists, while severely attacking the United States, Israel, liberalism and capitalism.
At the head of the list of such papers is the much respected daily Le Monde… It could eventually become Liberation, for which sales have dropped and which looks for ways to save itself. Caroline Fourest, a journalist of a popular satirical weekly Charlie-Hebdo (the newspaper which published the Danish caricatures and is facing legal action by Islamist organizations), expressed a concern that the financial contributions of Arab investors might influence the political direction of the French media. She remarked ironically : “One thinks of a new Libe, a mix of Al-Manar and Islamo-gauchism”. As for the difficult financial standing of some papers – she added – it could be better to let them to collapse, than to yield to the diktats of the Gulf Countries.
Is the situation of the French media really so bad, that they would be ready to sell their freedom of expression for the Arab dinars? It is difficult to answer this question definitively, because the information about the Moslem financing of some French media generally remains secret . On the other hand, there are no problems with the financial flow on the industrial markets, including the aeronautic and military ones.
Recently, Mrs. Michele Alliot-Marie, the French Minister of Defense, signed a preliminary contract with Saudi Arabia for a nice amount of Euro 2.5 billion. France will deliver to Saudi Arabia 30 Fennec combat helicopters, ten NH-90 transport helicopters for the Navy, and at least two air-tankers Airbus A330-200. In 2007, there a new large sales contract for weapons and military equipment, worth Euro 4.0 billion is expected. When Ares speaks, the Muses keep silent! 
In an American cultural magazine Telos, one can read an article by Russell Berman, entitled: Freedom of Expression Disappears: France and Its New Repressions” . In conclusion, the author wrote:
“Beyond a doubt, there is certainly a real and dangerous enemy of the West, ready to hijack planes and explode trains; but there is another enemy, a logic of fear and repression, which uses Islam as a pretext to develop a new culture of control.
This is the retreat of the West: unless it becomes willing to defend its freedoms at home, it will surely not fight for them against an external enemy in the East because: liberty is indivisible.”
· Prophet Of Doom
· Skeptics Quran
· Answering Islam
· Little Green Footballs
· Anwar Shaikh
· Islam and Jihad
· Apostates of Islam
· The Religion Of Peace
· Sword of Islam
· Militant Islam Monitor
· Ayaan Hirsi Ali
· Investigate Islam
· United American Committee
· UAC Blog
· Muslim Refusenik
· Islam Review at Blogspot
· Questionable Teachings of ISLAM
· United Front For The Victims Of Jihad
· Palestinian Media Watch
· Terror Watch
· Secular Islam
· Islam Review
· Terrorism Digest
· Religion of Peace My Ass!
· Apostates of Islam
· Daniel Pipes
· Western Resistance
· Know Islam
· Jihad Watch
· Former Muslims
· Congress Debate Koran
· Middle East Info
· Exposing Islam
· Protesting Islam
· Obsession The Movie
· Belmont Club
· No To Political Islam
· Maryam Namazie
· Mosque Watch
· Hate Free America
· Internet Haganah
· No Sharia
· Reform Syria
· War of 2 Worlds BBS
· More Sites Like This
· Books Critical of Islam
Islamic boys told of 'evil' Aussies
December 07, 2006
STUDENTS at the Islamic school from which two boys were expelled for desecrating the Bible were shown videos of a banned cleric calling Australian Christians "evil" and non-Muslim schools "sewers".
Teachers at East Preston Islamic College say students have also been seen downloading and copying material from a website that attacks the Bible as promoting "vicious criminal acts". The Australian yesterday revealed the school in Melbourne's north expelled two boys and suspended a third over the desecration - a Bible was urinated on, spat on and burnt - during a school camp for boys from years 7 to 10 boys last week.
The Australian has obtained a videotape from the school's library of a lecture given for Australian Muslims by the firebrand British convert Abdur Raheem Green, who was blocked from coming to Australia last year. In the video, believed to have been taped during a visit in 2003, Green describes Australian non-Muslims as "evil people" and says Muslims in this country must openly criticise Christianity and lure people to Islam.
"If we leave (Muslims) in these (non-Muslim Australian) schools they will be destroyed," he says in the sermon. "You know very well what takes place in these schools ... it is all about evolution, Christmas, Easter, St Valentine's Day - a barrage. And you expect your children to survive? You think you live in a sewer and you come up smelling of roses? "Merely living in the company of evil people will inevitably begin to rub off on us and we will begin to acquire their characteristics."
A teacher, who asked not to be named, confirmed that the tape, marked East Preston Islamic College, has been shown to students at the school. It is not known if the tape was seen by the three boys who desecrated the Bible. Another teacher said yesterday he had seen students at the school downloading and copying pages from the website Evilbible.com.
"For far too long priests and preachers have completely ignored the vicious criminal acts that the Bible promotes," the website says. "The so called God of the Bible makes Osama bin Laden look like a boy scout."
Aussie Bikini Protest
Now this is a protest.
MUSLIMS, socialists, unions and other groups will conduct a counter-rally
Police will monitor the demonstrations, with white supremacists claiming to have infiltrated bikini protest ranks, increasing the potential for confrontation.
Moron, it's being promoted on every website that hears about it.